With bated breath, the Sudanese are awaiting the formation of a new government next April, coinciding with the fourth anniversary of the fall of the Bashir regime. And after the final signing of the political process between the same forces that signed it within the framework of the military and civilians four months ago, the new government will be formed amid opposition from large revolutionary forces that cannot be bypassed and also from forces affiliated with the Al-Bashir regime, as well as the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudan Liberation Army. Observers believe that it will make it more difficult to form a government and make it impossible for it to continue until the end of the transitional period.
The official spokesman for the political process, Khaled Omar Youssef, announced last Sunday that the signing of the final agreement to end the coup will take place in early April, while the civilian power structures will be formed on the 11th of the same month.
Selk’s statement came after a second meeting held yesterday that included the Chairman of the Sovereignty Council, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, his deputy, Muhammad Hamdan Daglo “Hamedti”, and the civil forces that signed the framework agreement, to discuss the final arrangements for signing the final agreement and the formation of the civilian transitional authority structures.
Khaled Omar Youssef said, during a press conference after the end of the meeting, that the parties agreed on the final timelines for the conclusion of the political process, as the meeting approved the signing of the final agreement on April 1, while the signing of the transitional constitution on the sixth of April, provided that the formation of power structures Civil on the 11th of the same month.
Khaled Omar confirmed that the meeting also chose a committee to draft the terms of the final agreement, consisting of 11 people, 9 representing the civil forces that signed the framework agreement, one representative of the armed forces, and the same for the Rapid Support Forces.
And as soon as the results of the meeting were announced, the voices rejecting this agreement were louder. On the very next day, the Democratic Bloc held a press conference in Khartoum, during which it renewed its regret at the failure of the Forces for Freedom and Change, the Central Council and the signatories of the framework agreement, to respond to all calls to reach national consensus and leave the hijacking The scene cursed the non-participation in the upcoming government, stressing that it will resort to overthrowing the bloc that rejects others.
For his part, the official spokesman for the Sudan Liberation Movement led by Minawi, Nur al-Daim, said that the Central Council group wants to monopolize power and steal the aspirations of the Sudanese people and wants to overpower the democratic bloc and the armed struggle movements and sit on power.
It is noteworthy that the framework forces had called the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudan Liberation Army to a meeting on Sunday, but they were absent from it. The rest of the components of the bloc will remove the Bashir regime, except for the Unionist Party, one wing of which joined the agreement and the other wing is expected to join.
The Radical Alliance consisting of the Communist Party, professional organizations, some resistance committees, and revolutionary entities; He is considered one of the staunchest opponents of the framework agreement, and at the same time he still is
He clings to dropping the October 25 coup, and in turn renewed his threat to drop any agreement with the military who are currently in power, and also threatened to bring down any government emerging from the womb of this agreement.
There are also revolutionary forces that take the same position as the radical alliance, such as the Arab Socialist Baath Party and currents within parties that sign the framework, as well as revolutionaries who do not belong to any body.
The international community, represented by the facilitators of the political process, continued to support the agreement, which local opponents considered a blatant interference in internal affairs and a violation of national sovereignty, as this is one of the axes of immunity in addition to the rejection of exclusion and partisan quotas.
Those interested believe that the new government will not stand if it is not independent, and the security and strategic expert d. Tariq Muhammad Omar, pointing out that the tendency to form a partisan government is a big mistake.
In his interview with African Meters, Omar explained that political parties suffer from the problem of forgetting to practice politics because of the long period of Islamist rule alone.
Omar depended on the success of the new government by mutual consent and agreement on its independence and so that it would be able to perform its duties in drafting the constitution and organizing elections.
On the contrary, others see high chances for the survival and success of the new government in terms of the fact that it is supported internationally and finds a measure of local support sufficient for its survival, in addition to that its speedy implementation of its tasks will outweigh the support of its supporters among the forces of the revolution.
Political analyst Othman Fadlallah believes that the chances of success and failure so far are equal, and the implementation of what has been agreed upon will depend on the form of implementation determining its outcome.
And he continued with his interview with African Meters: If the forces of freedom and change seriously presented an image that differs from the image it presented before and presented a convincing cadre while working professionally in all files, then success will be written and vice versa.
